FOR
Price
$19.53
Change
-$0.21 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jun 16, 12:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.99B
36 days until earnings call
KDCCF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.09 (-15.25%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
34.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOR vs KDCCF

Header iconFOR vs KDCCF Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs KDCCFBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$19.53
Change-$0.21 (-1.06%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.99B
KADESTONE CAP
Price$0.50
Change-$0.09 (-15.25%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization34.35M
FOR vs KDCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. KDCCF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a StrongBuy and KDCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $19.74 vs. KDCCF: $0.50)
Brand notoriety: FOR and KDCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 66% vs. KDCCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. KDCCF: $34.35M
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. KDCCF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $34.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKDCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KDCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the long-term than KDCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FOR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while KDCCF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.51% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOR($1.99B) has a higher market cap than KDCCF($34.3M). KDCCF YTD gains are higher at: -15.924 vs. FOR (-23.843). FOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230M vs. KDCCF (-3.15M). FOR has more cash in the bank: 459M vs. KDCCF (8.9M). KDCCF has less debt than FOR: KDCCF (15.4M) vs FOR (714M). FOR has higher revenues than KDCCF: FOR (1.53B) vs KDCCF (-13.14K).
FORKDCCFFOR / KDCCF
Capitalization1.99B34.3M5,793%
EBITDA230M-3.15M-7,310%
Gain YTD-23.843-15.924150%
P/E Ratio10.84N/A-
Revenue1.53B-13.14K-11,609,860%
Total Cash459M8.9M5,156%
Total Debt714M15.4M4,636%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSZAX5.600.03
+0.54%
NexPoint Climate Tech A
IVRTX28.12-0.25
-0.88%
VY® CBRE Real Estate S2
HGOTX71.86-1.04
-1.43%
Hartford Growth Opportunities R5
HBSGX24.91-0.42
-1.66%
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS IB
GSMGX13.37-0.23
-1.69%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C

FOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOR has been loosely correlated with JOE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOR jumps, then JOE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOR
1D Price
Change %
FOR100%
-3.42%
JOE - FOR
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
CWK - FOR
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
HHH - FOR
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
RMR - FOR
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
OPEN - FOR
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.39%
More

KDCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KDCCF and OMH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KDCCF and OMH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KDCCF
1D Price
Change %
KDCCF100%
N/A
OMH - KDCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.33%
FOR - KDCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
OZ - KDCCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNPP - KDCCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WETH - KDCCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
More