FOR
Price
$19.74
Change
-$0.70 (-3.42%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
37 days until earnings call
JOE
Price
$46.10
Change
-$0.74 (-1.58%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.38B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOR vs JOE

Header iconFOR vs JOE Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs JOEBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$19.74
Change-$0.70 (-3.42%)
Volume$123.96K
Capitalization1.99B
St Joe
Price$46.10
Change-$0.74 (-1.58%)
Volume$182.59K
Capitalization3.38B
FOR vs JOE Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. JOE commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Hold and JOE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $19.74 vs. JOE: $46.10)
Brand notoriety: FOR and JOE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 66% vs. JOE: 78%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. JOE: $3.38B
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. JOE’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $3.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJOE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JOE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JOE is a better buy in the long-term than FOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JOE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JOE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the short-term than JOE.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while JOE (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

JOE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.10% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JOE($3.38B) has a higher market cap than FOR($1.99B). JOE has higher P/E ratio than FOR: JOE (43.22) vs FOR (10.84). JOE YTD gains are higher at: 3.224 vs. FOR (-23.843). FOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230M vs. JOE (169M). FOR has more cash in the bank: 459M vs. JOE (86.1M). JOE has less debt than FOR: JOE (633M) vs FOR (714M). FOR has higher revenues than JOE: FOR (1.53B) vs JOE (389M).
FORJOEFOR / JOE
Capitalization1.99B3.38B59%
EBITDA230M169M136%
Gain YTD-23.8433.224-740%
P/E Ratio10.8443.2225%
Revenue1.53B389M392%
Total Cash459M86.1M533%
Total Debt714M633M113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR vs JOE: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
JOE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7641
SMR RATING
1..100
6565
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7966
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JOE's Valuation (46) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOR (79). This means that JOE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOR’s over the last 12 months.

JOE's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOR (76). This means that JOE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOR’s over the last 12 months.

JOE's SMR Rating (65) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FOR (65). This means that JOE’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

JOE's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FOR (81). This means that JOE’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

JOE's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FOR (79). This means that JOE’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORJOE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REK16.950.14
+0.83%
ProShares Short Real Estate
BGH15.19-0.01
-0.03%
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund
GOOY12.12-0.01
-0.08%
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Stgy ETF
NYF51.89-0.17
-0.33%
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
ACWX60.43-0.79
-1.29%
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF

FOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOR has been loosely correlated with JOE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOR jumps, then JOE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOR
1D Price
Change %
FOR100%
-3.42%
JOE - FOR
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
CWK - FOR
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
HHH - FOR
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
RMR - FOR
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
OPEN - FOR
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.39%
More

JOE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JOE has been closely correlated with KW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JOE jumps, then KW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JOE
1D Price
Change %
JOE100%
-1.58%
KW - JOE
66%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
HHH - JOE
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
FOR - JOE
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.42%
RMR - JOE
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
MMI - JOE
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.08%
More