Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOPCX vs MIDBX
FOPCX vs MIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FOPCX vs MIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps C
Price$22.03
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
MFS International New Discovery B
Price$32.25
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.99B
FOPCX vs MIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOPCX vs. MIDBX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOPCX is a StrongBuy and MIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDBX has more cash in the bank: 6.99B vs. FOPCX (1.6B). MIDBX pays higher dividends than FOPCX: MIDBX (1.06) vs FOPCX (0.51). FOPCX was incepted earlier than MIDBX: FOPCX (20 years) vs MIDBX (25 years). MIDBX (2.06) and FOPCX (2.00) have similar cost to investors . FOPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. MIDBX (15.00). FOPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIDBX: FOPCX (0) vs MIDBX (1000). FOPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.03 vs. MIDBX (4.58). FOPCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.53 vs. MIDBX (1.38).
| FOPCX | MIDBX | FOPCX / MIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 2.05 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 2.06 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.628 | 17.213 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 6.99B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.06 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.03 | 4.58 | 328% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.74 | 19.19 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.53 | 1.38 | 911% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.44 | 25.77 | 227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement