Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOPAX vs MIDHX
FOPAX vs MIDHX Comparison
Open Charts FOPAX vs MIDHX
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps A
Price$23.76
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
MFS International New Discovery R3
Price$33.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.99B
FOPAX vs MIDHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOPAX vs. MIDHX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOPAX is a StrongBuy and MIDHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDHX has more cash in the bank: 6.99B vs. FOPAX (1.6B). MIDHX pays higher dividends than FOPAX: MIDHX (1.81) vs FOPAX (1.01). FOPAX was incepted earlier than MIDHX: FOPAX (20 years) vs MIDHX (20 years). MIDHX (1.31) and FOPAX (1.25) have similar cost to investors . FOPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. MIDHX (15.00). FOPAX (0) and MIDHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FOPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. MIDHX (5.53). FOPAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.46 vs. MIDHX (5.91).
| FOPAX | MIDHX | FOPAX / MIDHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.30 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.31 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.204 | 17.841 | 136% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 6.99B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.81 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | 5.53 | 294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.01 | 22.38 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | 5.91 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.34 | 36.90 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement