Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOPAX vs MIDCX
FOPAX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FOPAX vs MIDCX
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps A
Price$23.76
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$31.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.99B
FOPAX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOPAX vs. MIDCX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOPAX is a StrongBuy and MIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.99B vs. FOPAX (1.6B). MIDCX pays higher dividends than FOPAX: MIDCX (1.38) vs FOPAX (1.01). FOPAX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: FOPAX (20 years) vs MIDCX (25 years). MIDCX (2.06) is less costly to investors than FOPAX (1.25). FOPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). FOPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIDCX: FOPAX (0) vs MIDCX (1000). FOPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. MIDCX (4.44). FOPAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.46 vs. MIDCX (0.89).
| FOPAX | MIDCX | FOPAX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.05 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.06 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.204 | 17.243 | 140% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 6.99B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.38 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | 4.44 | 367% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.01 | 18.83 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | 0.89 | 2,062% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.34 | 24.82 | 271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement