FOCIF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
433.79M
KENS
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.16 (+160.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOCIF vs KENS

Header iconFOCIF vs KENS Comparison
Open Charts FOCIF vs KENSBanner chart's image
Focusrite
Price$2.50
Change-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization433.79M
Kenilworth Systems
Price$0.26
Change+$0.16 (+160.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization2.62M
FOCIF vs KENS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KENS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOCIF vs. KENS commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOCIF is a Hold and KENS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FOCIF: $2.50 vs. KENS: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: FOCIF and KENS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOCIF: 88% vs. KENS: 58%
Market capitalization -- FOCIF: $433.79M vs. KENS: $2.62M
FOCIF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $433.79M. KENS’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $2.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOCIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKENS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOCIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KENS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOCIF is a better buy in the long-term than KENS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOCIF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KENS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOCIF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • KENS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOCIF is a better buy in the short-term than KENS.

Price Growth

FOCIF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KENS (@Recreational Products) price change was +152.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+4.20% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOCIF($434M) has a higher market cap than KENS($2.62M). KENS has higher P/E ratio than FOCIF: KENS (588.24) vs FOCIF (13.32). KENS YTD gains are higher at: -7.824 vs. FOCIF (-31.880). FOCIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 36.4M vs. KENS (-23.85K). FOCIF has more cash in the bank: 13.5M vs. KENS (702). KENS has less debt than FOCIF: KENS (7.5K) vs FOCIF (26.8M). FOCIF has higher revenues than KENS: FOCIF (177M) vs KENS (0).
FOCIFKENSFOCIF / KENS
Capitalization434M2.62M16,540%
EBITDA36.4M-23.85K-152,614%
Gain YTD-31.880-7.824407%
P/E Ratio13.32588.242%
Revenue177M0-
Total Cash13.5M7021,923,077%
Total Debt26.8M7.5K357,333%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOCIF vs KENS: Fundamental Ratings
FOCIF
KENS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
4795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8579
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
491
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOCIF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KENS (99). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than KENS’s over the last 12 months.

KENS's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCIF (100). This means that KENS’s stock grew similarly to FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

FOCIF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KENS (95). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KENS’s over the last 12 months.

KENS's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCIF (85). This means that KENS’s stock grew similarly to FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

FOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KENS (91). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than KENS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOCIFKENS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KENS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UAMY2.220.09
+4.23%
United States Antimony Corp
GDYN12.390.43
+3.60%
Grid Dynamics Holdings
VLO144.582.52
+1.77%
Valero Energy Corp
PCYO11.090.10
+0.91%
Pure Cycle Corp
GTES24.010.11
+0.46%
Gates Industrial Corp

FOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCIF and ANPDY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCIF and ANPDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOCIF
1D Price
Change %
FOCIF100%
N/A
ANPDY - FOCIF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CUKPF - FOCIF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
GYYMF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KENS - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
+152.94%
More

KENS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KENS and CLKXF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KENS and CLKXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KENS
1D Price
Change %
KENS100%
+152.94%
CLKXF - KENS
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - KENS
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - KENS
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
FOCIF - KENS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBYF - KENS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More