Advertisement
FOCIF vs KENS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOCIF is a Hold and KENS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FOCIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKENS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FOCIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KENS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KENS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- KENS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
FOCIF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KENS (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.67%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (+1.26% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| FOCIF | KENS | FOCIF / KENS | |
| Capitalization | 434M | 2.62M | 16,540% |
| EBITDA | 36.4M | -23.85K | -152,614% |
| Gain YTD | -31.880 | 0.036 | -89,244% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.32 | 588.24 | 2% |
| Revenue | 177M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 13.5M | 702 | 1,923,077% |
| Total Debt | 26.8M | 7.5K | 357,333% |
FOCIF | KENS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FOCIF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KENS (100). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than KENS’s over the last 12 months.
KENS's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCIF (100). This means that KENS’s stock grew similarly to FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.
FOCIF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KENS (95). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KENS’s over the last 12 months.
KENS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (84). This means that KENS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.
FOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KENS (90). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than KENS’s over the last 12 months.
| FOCIF | KENS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 10% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 10% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
FOCIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCIF and ANPDY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCIF and ANPDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOCIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOCIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ANPDY - FOCIF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| CUKPF - FOCIF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GYYMF - FOCIF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ANPDF - FOCIF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KENS - FOCIF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
KENS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KENS and CLKXF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KENS and CLKXF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KENS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENS | 100% | N/A | ||
| CLKXF - KENS | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ANPDF - KENS | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CUKPF - KENS | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FOCIF - KENS | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GBBYF - KENS | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||