FOCIF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
433.79M
GYYMF
Price
$2.00
Change
+$0.09 (+4.71%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
240.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOCIF vs GYYMF

Header iconFOCIF vs GYYMF Comparison
Open Charts FOCIF vs GYYMFBanner chart's image
Focusrite
Price$2.50
Change-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization433.79M
Gym Group
Price$2.00
Change+$0.09 (+4.71%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization240.3M
FOCIF vs GYYMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GYYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOCIF vs. GYYMF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOCIF is a Hold and GYYMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FOCIF: $2.50 vs. GYYMF: $2.00)
Brand notoriety: FOCIF and GYYMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOCIF: 88% vs. GYYMF: 229%
Market capitalization -- FOCIF: $433.79M vs. GYYMF: $240.3M
FOCIF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $433.79M. GYYMF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $240.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOCIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGYYMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOCIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GYYMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOCIF is a better buy in the long-term than GYYMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOCIF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GYYMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOCIF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GYYMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GYYMF is a better buy in the short-term than FOCIF.

Price Growth

FOCIF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GYYMF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+4.20% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOCIF($434M) has a higher market cap than GYYMF($240M). GYYMF YTD gains are higher at: 2.041 vs. FOCIF (-31.880). GYYMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 56.2M vs. FOCIF (36.4M). FOCIF has more cash in the bank: 13.5M vs. GYYMF (5.4M). FOCIF has less debt than GYYMF: FOCIF (26.8M) vs GYYMF (420M). FOCIF (177M) and GYYMF (173M) have equivalent revenues.
FOCIFGYYMFFOCIF / GYYMF
Capitalization434M240M181%
EBITDA36.4M56.2M65%
Gain YTD-31.8802.041-1,562%
P/E Ratio13.32N/A-
Revenue177M173M102%
Total Cash13.5M5.4M250%
Total Debt26.8M420M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOCIF vs GYYMF: Fundamental Ratings
FOCIF
GYYMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
4790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
453
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5062

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOCIF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GYYMF (99). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than GYYMF’s over the last 12 months.

GYYMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCIF (100). This means that GYYMF’s stock grew similarly to FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

FOCIF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GYYMF (90). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GYYMF’s over the last 12 months.

GYYMF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (85). This means that GYYMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

FOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GYYMF (53). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GYYMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOCIFGYYMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GYYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFTHX62.311.01
+1.65%
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
FGHMX119.250.87
+0.73%
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesC
STEYX15.760.04
+0.25%
AB International Strat Eqs Adv
WIIGX24.980.05
+0.20%
Wasatch International Growth Instl
LYFAX12.21-0.01
-0.08%
AlphaCentric Life Sciences & Hlthcare A

FOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCIF and ANPDY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCIF and ANPDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOCIF
1D Price
Change %
FOCIF100%
N/A
ANPDY - FOCIF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CUKPF - FOCIF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
GYYMF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KENS - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
+152.94%
More

GYYMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GYYMF and LEAT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GYYMF and LEAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GYYMF
1D Price
Change %
GYYMF100%
N/A
LEAT - GYYMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
BSFFF - GYYMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - GYYMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
FOCIF - GYYMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBYF - GYYMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More