Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOBAX vs RLBGX
FOBAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts FOBAX vs RLBGX
Tributary Balanced Instl
Price$20.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.08M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.23
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
FOBAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOBAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOBAX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. FOBAX (83.1M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than FOBAX: RLBGX (2.15) vs FOBAX (1.24). FOBAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: FOBAX (29 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). FOBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FOBAX (22.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: RLBGX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.64 vs. FOBAX (5.86). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.65 vs. FOBAX (19.66).
| FOBAX | RLBGX | FOBAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.25 | 380% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.25 | 524% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.418 | 9.228 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.1M | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.15 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 10.64 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.07 | 35.96 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.66 | 41.65 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.93 | 68.54 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement