Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOBAX vs RLBGX
FOBAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts FOBAX vs RLBGX
Tributary Balanced Instl
Price$21.53
Change-$0.23 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.69M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$39.11
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FOBAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOBAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOBAX is a Hold and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FOBAX (82.7M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than FOBAX: RLBGX (2.01) vs FOBAX (1.19). FOBAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: FOBAX (29 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). FOBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FOBAX (22.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: RLBGX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. FOBAX (4.12). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.37 vs. FOBAX (17.09).
| FOBAX | RLBGX | FOBAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.25 | 364% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.25 | 528% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.040 | 16.570 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.7M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 2.01 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | 10.35 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.54 | 44.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.09 | 43.37 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.60 | 81.84 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement