FOA
Price
$23.42
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Dec 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
184.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SYF
Price
$83.36
Change
+$0.15 (+0.18%)
Updated
Dec 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.97B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOA vs SYF

Header iconFOA vs SYF Comparison
Open Charts FOA vs SYFBanner chart's image
Finance of America Companies
Price$23.42
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$200
Capitalization184.89M
Synchrony Financial
Price$83.36
Change+$0.15 (+0.18%)
Volume$17.95K
Capitalization29.97B
FOA vs SYF Comparison Chart in %
FOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOA vs. SYF commentary
Dec 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOA is a Hold and SYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FOA: $23.43 vs. SYF: $83.21)
Brand notoriety: FOA: Not notable vs. SYF: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOA: 146% vs. SYF: 87%
Market capitalization -- FOA: $184.89M vs. SYF: $29.97B
FOA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $184.89M. SYF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $29.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $668.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FOA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SYF is a better buy in the long-term than FOA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOA’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOA is a better buy in the short-term than SYF.

Price Growth

FOA (@Savings Banks) experienced а +3.13% price change this week, while SYF (@Savings Banks) price change was +4.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

SYF is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.67% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SYF($30B) has a higher market cap than FOA($185M). SYF has higher P/E ratio than FOA: SYF (9.12) vs FOA (3.17). SYF YTD gains are higher at: 30.292 vs. FOA (-16.679). SYF has less debt than FOA: SYF (14.4B) vs FOA (30.1B). SYF has higher revenues than FOA: SYF (15B) vs FOA (226M).
FOASYFFOA / SYF
Capitalization185M30B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.67930.292-55%
P/E Ratio3.179.1235%
Revenue226M15B2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt30.1B14.4B209%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOA vs SYF: Fundamental Ratings
FOA
SYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2414
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8820
SMR RATING
1..100
414
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5813
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
443
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOA's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYF (70) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SYF’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOA (88) in the null industry. This means that SYF’s stock grew significantly faster than FOA’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's SMR Rating (4) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOA (41) in the null industry. This means that SYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOA’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOA (58) in the null industry. This means that SYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYF (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOASYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPONF469.64N/A
N/A
NIPPON PROLOGIS REIT INC.
ANICF0.19N/A
N/A
ANONYMOUS INTELLIGENCE CO INC.
MTWTF12.31N/A
N/A
Metawater Co Ltd
CEBCF0.48N/A
N/A
China Everbright Bank Co Ltd.
PSRHF0.50-0.03
-5.63%
PULSAR HELIUM INC.

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOA has been loosely correlated with CACC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOA jumps, then CACC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
+0.13%
CACC - FOA
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
NNI - FOA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
RM - FOA
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
SYF - FOA
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
YRD - FOA
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More

SYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYF has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SYF jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SYF
1D Price
Change %
SYF100%
-1.20%
COF - SYF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
OMF - SYF
86%
Closely correlated
-2.35%
BFH - SYF
86%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
AXP - SYF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.00%
ALLY - SYF
80%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More