FOA
Price
$23.59
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
68.72M
PMTS
Price
$25.25
Change
+$0.14 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jul 7, 12:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
197.69M
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOA vs PMTS

Header iconFOA vs PMTS Comparison
Open Charts FOA vs PMTSBanner chart's image
Finance of America Companies
Price$23.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$48.19K
Capitalization68.72M
CPI Card Group
Price$25.25
Change+$0.14 (+0.56%)
Volume$100
Capitalization197.69M
FOA vs PMTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOA vs. PMTS commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOA is a Buy and PMTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FOA: $23.59 vs. PMTS: $25.11)
Brand notoriety: FOA and PMTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOA: 55% vs. PMTS: 28%
Market capitalization -- FOA: $68.72M vs. PMTS: $197.69M
FOA [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $68.72M. PMTS’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $197.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePMTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PMTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOA is a better buy in the long-term than PMTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PMTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FOA and PMTS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FOA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while PMTS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +5.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

PMTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.42% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMTS($198M) has a higher market cap than FOA($68.7M). PMTS (-15.992) and FOA (-16.110) have similar YTD gains . PMTS has less debt than FOA: PMTS (272M) vs FOA (26.3B). PMTS has higher revenues than FOA: PMTS (445M) vs FOA (177M).
FOAPMTSFOA / PMTS
Capitalization68.7M198M35%
EBITDAN/A77.3M-
Gain YTD-16.110-15.992101%
P/E RatioN/A8.63-
Revenue177M445M40%
Total CashN/A12.4M-
Total Debt26.3B272M9,669%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOA vs PMTS: Fundamental Ratings
FOA
PMTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8651
SMR RATING
1..100
17100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
269
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOA's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTS (68) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

PMTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOA (86) in the null industry. This means that PMTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMTS (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTS (58) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMTS (69) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOAPMTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNECF13.101.00
+8.26%
Renesas Electronics Corp
PPBN33.00N/A
N/A
Pinnacle Bankshares Corp.
ROVMD0.14N/A
N/A
Rover Critical Minerals Corp
TYOBY6.85N/A
N/A
Toyobo Co., Ltd.
KTWIY78.07-0.48
-0.61%
Kurita Water Industries Ltd.

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOA and PMTS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOA and PMTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
N/A
PMTS - FOA
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
CTOS - FOA
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
COOP - FOA
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
ATLC - FOA
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
OPRT - FOA
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
More

PMTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMTS has been loosely correlated with VSTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMTS jumps, then VSTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMTS
1D Price
Change %
PMTS100%
+2.78%
VSTS - PMTS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
SYF - PMTS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
OMF - PMTS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
ENVA - PMTS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
COF - PMTS
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More