FOA
Price
$27.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
308M
PMTS
Price
$14.30
Change
-$0.44 (-2.99%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
162.12M
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOA vs PMTS

Header iconFOA vs PMTS Comparison
Open Charts FOA vs PMTSBanner chart's image
Finance of America Companies
Price$27.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$198.63K
Capitalization308M
CPI Card Group
Price$14.30
Change-$0.44 (-2.99%)
Volume$29.46K
Capitalization162.12M
FOA vs PMTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOA vs. PMTS commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOA is a Hold and PMTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FOA: $27.80 vs. PMTS: $14.30)
Brand notoriety: FOA and PMTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOA: 203% vs. PMTS: 51%
Market capitalization -- FOA: $308M vs. PMTS: $162.12M
FOA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $308M. PMTS’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $162.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $666.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePMTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FOA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PMTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOA is a better buy in the long-term than PMTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PMTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMTS is a better buy in the short-term than FOA.

Price Growth

FOA (@Savings Banks) experienced а +4.08% price change this week, while PMTS (@Savings Banks) price change was -8.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

PMTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.52% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOA($308M) has a higher market cap than PMTS($162M). PMTS has higher P/E ratio than FOA: PMTS (12.88) vs FOA (4.01). FOA YTD gains are higher at: -1.138 vs. PMTS (-52.158). PMTS has less debt than FOA: PMTS (323M) vs FOA (29.5B). PMTS has higher revenues than FOA: PMTS (502M) vs FOA (454M).
FOAPMTSFOA / PMTS
Capitalization308M162M190%
EBITDAN/A75.4M-
Gain YTD-1.138-52.1582%
P/E Ratio4.0112.8831%
Revenue454M502M90%
Total CashN/A17.1M-
Total Debt29.5B323M9,133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOA vs PMTS: Fundamental Ratings
FOA
PMTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1967
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8672
SMR RATING
1..100
18100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3893
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
482
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5017

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMTS's Valuation (16) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FOA (21) in the null industry. This means that PMTS’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

PMTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FOA (86) in the null industry. This means that PMTS’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMTS (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMTS (93) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMTS (82) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOAPMTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRYCY4.32N/A
N/A
China Railroad Signal & Communication Corp Ltd.
KCKSF0.36N/A
N/A
Keck Seng Investments
RAFLF0.80N/A
N/A
Raffles Medical Group Ltd.
CMXHF137.00N/A
N/A
CSL Ltd.
SNIPF0.04N/A
-0.82%
Snipp Interactive Inc

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOA and PMTS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOA and PMTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
N/A
PMTS - FOA
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
CTOS - FOA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
CACC - FOA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
V - FOA
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
BFH - FOA
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
More

PMTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMTS has been loosely correlated with VSTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMTS jumps, then VSTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMTS
1D Price
Change %
PMTS100%
-2.99%
VSTS - PMTS
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
SEZL - PMTS
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
ENVA - PMTS
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
COF - PMTS
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
OMF - PMTS
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
More