FOA
Price
$22.82
Change
-$0.21 (-0.91%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
181.74M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GDOT
Price
$12.11
Change
+$0.10 (+0.83%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
667.14M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOA vs GDOT

Header iconFOA vs GDOT Comparison
Open Charts FOA vs GDOTBanner chart's image
Finance of America Companies
Price$22.82
Change-$0.21 (-0.91%)
Volume$900
Capitalization181.74M
Green Dot
Price$12.11
Change+$0.10 (+0.83%)
Volume$10.66K
Capitalization667.14M
FOA vs GDOT Comparison Chart in %
FOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GDOT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOA vs. GDOT commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOA is a Hold and GDOT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FOA: $23.03 vs. GDOT: $12.01)
Brand notoriety: FOA and GDOT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOA: 75% vs. GDOT: 164%
Market capitalization -- FOA: $181.74M vs. GDOT: $667.14M
FOA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $181.74M. GDOT’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $667.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $632.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $20.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGDOT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FOA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GDOT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOA is a better buy in the long-term than GDOT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GDOT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GDOT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FOA and GDOT are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FOA (@Savings Banks) experienced а -3.15% price change this week, while GDOT (@Savings Banks) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

GDOT is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-1.57% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDOT($667M) has a higher market cap than FOA($182M). GDOT has higher P/E ratio than FOA: GDOT (73.23) vs FOA (3.17). FOA YTD gains are higher at: -4.874 vs. GDOT (-6.245). GDOT has less debt than FOA: GDOT (66.5M) vs FOA (30.1B). GDOT has higher revenues than FOA: GDOT (2.01B) vs FOA (226M).
FOAGDOTFOA / GDOT
Capitalization182M667M27%
EBITDAN/A154M-
Gain YTD-4.874-6.24578%
P/E Ratio3.1773.234%
Revenue226M2.01B11%
Total CashN/A1.64B-
Total Debt30.1B66.5M45,263%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOA vs GDOT: Fundamental Ratings
FOA
GDOT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
4092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOA's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDOT (96) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as GDOT (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDOT (92) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

GDOT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FOA (56) in the null industry. This means that GDOT’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

GDOT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FOA (5) in the null industry. This means that GDOT’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOAGDOT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GDOT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRFCX12.840.10
+0.78%
Calvert Focused Value C
IIVAX27.23-0.09
-0.33%
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value A
NSBAX62.86-0.29
-0.46%
Nuveen Dividend Growth A
RVPHX8.25-0.05
-0.60%
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Invmt
JAAGX83.20-0.81
-0.96%
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Instl

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOA has been loosely correlated with NNI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOA jumps, then NNI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
-1.29%
NNI - FOA
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
GDOT - FOA
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
OMF - FOA
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
OPRT - FOA
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
YRD - FOA
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More

GDOT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDOT has been loosely correlated with NNI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDOT jumps, then NNI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDOT
1D Price
Change %
GDOT100%
-1.96%
NNI - GDOT
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
NAVI - GDOT
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
ALLY - GDOT
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
OMF - GDOT
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
BFH - GDOT
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.22%
More