Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNY vs MDYG
FNY vs MDYG Comparison
Open Charts FNY vs MDYG
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$88.04
Change-$3.15 (-3.45%)
Volume$36.86K
Net Assets440.4M
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF
Price$90.25
Change-$2.16 (-2.34%)
Volume$78.98K
Net Assets2.37B
FNY vs MDYG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNY vs. MDYG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNY is a Hold and MDYG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.37B vs. FNY (440M). FNY has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYG: FNY (14.025) vs MDYG (6.973). FNY was incepted earlier than MDYG: FNY (15 years) vs MDYG (20 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FNY (0.70). FNY has a higher turnover MDYG (41.00) vs MDYG (41.00).
| FNY | MDYG | FNY / MDYG | |
| Gain YTD | 14.025 | 6.973 | 201% |
| Net Assets | 440M | 2.37B | 19% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.15 | 467% |
| Turnover | 134.00 | 41.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 0.78 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNY | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNY has been closely correlated with FLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNY jumps, then FLS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNY | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| FLS - FNY | 82% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| TRMB - FNY | 81% Closely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| BDC - FNY | 81% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| PIPR - FNY | 80% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| TPG - FNY | 77% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
More | ||||
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| FLS - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CG - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||