Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs WAFMX
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World F3
Price$86.15
Change-$1.04 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.56B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.76
Change-$0.04 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.53M
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 68.6B vs. WAFMX (37.5M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: FNWFX (1.15) vs WAFMX (0.70). FNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: FNWFX (8 years) vs WAFMX (13 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (29.00). WAFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: WAFMX (2000) vs FNWFX (1000000). WAFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.05 vs. FNWFX (8.41). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.35 vs. FNWFX (34.33).
| FNWFX | WAFMX | FNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.20 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.38 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.854 | 8.986 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.6B | 37.5M | 182,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.70 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.41 | 12.05 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.58 | 46.23 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.33 | 41.35 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers