Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs WAFMX
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World F3
Price$95.91
Change-$0.09 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.64B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.28M
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.6B vs. WAFMX (34.3M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: FNWFX (1.02) vs WAFMX (0.70). FNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: FNWFX (9 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). WAFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: WAFMX (2000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.60 vs. WAFMX (1.27). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.89 vs. WAFMX (19.05).
| FNWFX | WAFMX | FNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.20 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.38 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.526 | 8.116 | 302% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.6B | 34.3M | 217,493% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.70 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.60 | 1.27 | 1,227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.84 | 54.62 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.89 | 19.05 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement