Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs WAESX
FNWFX vs WAESX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs WAESX
American Funds New World F3
Price$98.93
Change+$2.47 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Investor
Price$18.69
Change+$0.87 (+4.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.52M
FNWFX vs WAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. WAESX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and WAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. WAESX (212M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than WAESX: FNWFX (1.36) vs WAESX (0.00). FNWFX was incepted earlier than WAESX: FNWFX (9 years) vs WAESX (13 years). WAESX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. WAESX (28.00). WAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: WAESX (2000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.96 vs. WAESX (10.01). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.58 vs. WAESX (-5.75).
| FNWFX | WAESX | FNWFX / WAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.37 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.37 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.114 | 2.580 | 237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 212M | 35,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.96 | 10.01 | 279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.04 | 20.66 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | -5.75 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 131.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement