Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs TSMGX
FNWFX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World F3
Price$86.15
Change-$1.04 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.56B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$15.63
Change-$0.23 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
FNWFX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. TSMGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and TSMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 68.6B vs. TSMGX (1.95B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: FNWFX (1.15) vs TSMGX (0.00). FNWFX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: FNWFX (8 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). TSMGX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (17.00). TSMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: TSMGX (2500) vs FNWFX (1000000). TSMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. FNWFX (8.41). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.33 vs. TSMGX (9.82).
| FNWFX | TSMGX | FNWFX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.44 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.57 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.854 | 10.930 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.6B | 1.95B | 3,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.41 | 9.45 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.58 | 21.16 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.33 | 9.82 | 350% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement