Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs GTDFX
FNWFX vs GTDFX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs GTDFX
American Funds New World F3
Price$94.54
Change-$0.74 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.45B
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$38.65
Change-$0.24 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
FNWFX vs GTDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. GTDFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and GTDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. GTDFX (1.27B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: GTDFX (1.42) vs FNWFX (1.06). FNWFX was incepted earlier than GTDFX: FNWFX (9 years) vs GTDFX (13 years). GTDFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDFX (20.00). FNWFX (1000000) and GTDFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.65 vs. GTDFX (12.51). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.61 vs. GTDFX (10.81).
| FNWFX | GTDFX | FNWFX / GTDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.01 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.01 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.747 | 19.551 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.4B | 1.27B | 5,844% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.42 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.65 | 12.51 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.06 | 45.34 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.61 | 10.81 | 320% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement