Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs GTDCX
FNWFX vs GTDCX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs GTDCX
American Funds New World F3
Price$93.42
Change+$0.22 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$34.07
Change+$0.31 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
FNWFX vs GTDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. GTDCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and GTDCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GTDCX (1.04B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than GTDCX: FNWFX (1.00) vs GTDCX (0.16). FNWFX was incepted earlier than GTDCX: FNWFX (9 years) vs GTDCX (27 years). GTDCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDCX (20.00). GTDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: GTDCX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.60 vs. GTDCX (4.09). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.39 vs. GTDCX (-16.18).
| FNWFX | GTDCX | FNWFX / GTDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.293 | 5.742 | 371% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 1.04B | 7,240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.16 | 617% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.60 | 4.09 | 479% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.91 | 11.81 | 380% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.39 | -16.18 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement