FNWD
Price
$28.70
Change
-$0.23 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
105.75M
37 days until earnings call
UBOH
Price
$27.75
Change
+$0.03 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
56.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNWD vs UBOH

Header iconFNWD vs UBOH Comparison
Open Charts FNWD vs UBOHBanner chart's image
Finward Ban
Price$28.70
Change-$0.23 (-0.80%)
Volume$5.04K
Capitalization105.75M
United Bancshares
Price$27.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
Volume$215
Capitalization56.14M
FNWD vs UBOH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNWD vs. UBOH commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWD is a StrongBuy and UBOH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FNWD: $28.70 vs. UBOH: $27.75)
Brand notoriety: FNWD and UBOH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWD: 67% vs. UBOH: 13%
Market capitalization -- FNWD: $105.75M vs. UBOH: $56.14M
FNWD [@Regional Banks] is valued at $105.75M. UBOH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $56.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBOH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UBOH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBOH is a better buy in the long-term than FNWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FNWD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FNWD (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.53% price change this week, while UBOH (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWD is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWD($106M) has a higher market cap than UBOH($56.1M). FNWD has higher P/E ratio than UBOH: FNWD (12.62) vs UBOH (5.62). FNWD YTD gains are higher at: 2.952 vs. UBOH (-9.035). UBOH has less debt than FNWD: UBOH (18.8M) vs FNWD (80M). FNWD has higher revenues than UBOH: FNWD (65.3M) vs UBOH (42.8M).
FNWDUBOHFNWD / UBOH
Capitalization106M56.1M189%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.952-9.035-33%
P/E Ratio12.625.62224%
Revenue65.3M42.8M153%
Total Cash23.2MN/A-
Total Debt80M18.8M426%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWD vs UBOH: Fundamental Ratings
FNWD
UBOH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8443
SMR RATING
1..100
6153
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBOH's Valuation (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWD (70) in the null industry. This means that UBOH’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

UBOH's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWD (84) in the null industry. This means that UBOH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

UBOH's SMR Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWD (61) in the null industry. This means that UBOH’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

UBOH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWD (58) in the null industry. This means that UBOH’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

FNWD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as UBOH (16) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWD’s stock grew similarly to UBOH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PUMYX15.04N/A
N/A
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Y
FUGIX46.54-0.30
-0.64%
Fidelity Advisor Utilities I
LIDCX9.35-0.12
-1.27%
Lord Abbett International Value C
DFVEX27.07-0.37
-1.35%
DFA US Vector Equity I
VESMX18.42-0.35
-1.86%
VELA Small Cap I

FNWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWD has been loosely correlated with BVFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWD jumps, then BVFL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWD
1D Price
Change %
FNWD100%
-0.80%
BVFL - FNWD
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
MNSB - FNWD
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
SYBT - FNWD
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
PRK - FNWD
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
PWOD - FNWD
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More

UBOH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBOH and FNWD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBOH and FNWD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBOH
1D Price
Change %
UBOH100%
+0.11%
FNWD - UBOH
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
ALRS - UBOH
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
CCNE - UBOH
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
GNTY - UBOH
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
PCB - UBOH
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More