FNWB
Price
$7.10
Change
-$0.10 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
63.21M
45 days until earnings call
MOFG
Price
$29.83
Change
-$0.34 (-1.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
617.67M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNWB vs MOFG

Header iconFNWB vs MOFG Comparison
Open Charts FNWB vs MOFGBanner chart's image
First Northwest Ban
Price$7.10
Change-$0.10 (-1.39%)
Volume$44.4K
Capitalization63.21M
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$29.83
Change-$0.34 (-1.13%)
Volume$135.48K
Capitalization617.67M
FNWB vs MOFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNWB vs. MOFG commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWB is a StrongBuy and MOFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FNWB: $7.10 vs. MOFG: $29.83)
Brand notoriety: FNWB and MOFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWB: 169% vs. MOFG: 123%
Market capitalization -- FNWB: $63.21M vs. MOFG: $617.67M
FNWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $63.21M. MOFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $617.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMOFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MOFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MOFG is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOFG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNWB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MOFG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOFG is a better buy in the short-term than FNWB.

Price Growth

FNWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.57% price change this week, while MOFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOFG($618M) has a higher market cap than FNWB($63.2M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than MOFG: FNWB (43.38) vs MOFG (13.95). MOFG YTD gains are higher at: 4.981 vs. FNWB (-29.483). MOFG has more cash in the bank: 78.7M vs. FNWB (16.8M). MOFG has less debt than FNWB: MOFG (112M) vs FNWB (360M).
FNWBMOFGFNWB / MOFG
Capitalization63.2M618M10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-29.4834.981-592%
P/E Ratio43.3813.95311%
Revenue65.2MN/A-
Total Cash16.8M78.7M21%
Total Debt360M112M321%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWB vs MOFG: Fundamental Ratings
FNWB
MOFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5765
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10050
SMR RATING
1..100
9268
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNWB's Valuation (88) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's SMR Rating (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (92) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (86) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (11) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWBMOFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMCFX29.830.02
+0.07%
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth R5
ANPRX30.14N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value R6
HADAX28.92-0.03
-0.10%
Hartford Balanced HLS IA
RYKCX85.46-1.08
-1.25%
Rydex Banking C
PFSZX26.13-0.43
-1.62%
PGIM Jennison Financial Services Z

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with INDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then INDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
-1.39%
INDB - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
CMA - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
AX - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
CNOB - FNWB
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BKU - FNWB
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
More

MOFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOFG
1D Price
Change %
MOFG100%
-1.13%
FMBH - MOFG
87%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
SRCE - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
FFIN - MOFG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
TCBK - MOFG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
BBT - MOFG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
More