FNWB
Price
$8.18
Change
+$0.16 (+2.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
72.82M
66 days until earnings call
MOFG
Price
$28.51
Change
-$0.80 (-2.73%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
590.34M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNWB vs MOFG

Header iconFNWB vs MOFG Comparison
Open Charts FNWB vs MOFGBanner chart's image
First Northwest Ban
Price$8.18
Change+$0.16 (+2.00%)
Volume$83.55K
Capitalization72.82M
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$28.51
Change-$0.80 (-2.73%)
Volume$194.68K
Capitalization590.34M
FNWB vs MOFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNWB vs. MOFG commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWB is a Hold and MOFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FNWB: $8.18 vs. MOFG: $28.51)
Brand notoriety: FNWB and MOFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWB: 401% vs. MOFG: 134%
Market capitalization -- FNWB: $72.82M vs. MOFG: $590.34M
FNWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $72.82M. MOFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $590.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMOFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MOFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MOFG is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNWB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MOFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNWB is a better buy in the short-term than MOFG.

Price Growth

FNWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.55% price change this week, while MOFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOFG($590M) has a higher market cap than FNWB($72.8M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than MOFG: FNWB (43.38) vs MOFG (13.95). MOFG YTD gains are higher at: -0.469 vs. FNWB (-18.756). MOFG has more cash in the bank: 68.5M vs. FNWB (16.8M). MOFG has less debt than FNWB: MOFG (111M) vs FNWB (324M). MOFG has higher revenues than FNWB: MOFG (82.4M) vs FNWB (62.5M).
FNWBMOFGFNWB / MOFG
Capitalization72.8M590M12%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.756-0.4693,997%
P/E Ratio43.3813.95311%
Revenue62.5M82.4M76%
Total Cash16.8M68.5M25%
Total Debt324M111M292%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWB vs MOFG: Fundamental Ratings
FNWB
MOFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
167
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
9267
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
310
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNWB's Valuation (88) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's SMR Rating (67) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (92) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (64) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (10) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWBMOFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBHIX22.900.18
+0.79%
Saratoga Health & Biotechnology I
GCIFX15.430.05
+0.33%
Green Century MSCI Intl Indx Instl
DRGTX104.17-0.37
-0.35%
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology Inst
VGIFX88.44-0.31
-0.35%
JPMorgan US Value R5
MIDFX61.49-0.48
-0.77%
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Instl

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with INDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then INDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
+2.00%
INDB - FNWB
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
MOFG - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
HOPE - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
CWBC - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
AX - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
More

MOFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOFG
1D Price
Change %
MOFG100%
-2.73%
FMBH - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
HBNC - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
BHLB - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
OBK - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
SRCE - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
More