FNV
Price
$202.83
Change
-$0.55 (-0.27%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
39.09B
102 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAND
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
3.45B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNV vs SAND

Header iconFNV vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts FNV vs SANDBanner chart's image
Franco-Nevada
Price$202.83
Change-$0.55 (-0.27%)
Volume$2.17M
Capitalization39.09B
Sandstorm Gold
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.51M
Capitalization3.45B
FNV vs SAND Comparison Chart in %
FNV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNV vs. SAND commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNV is a Hold and SAND is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FNV: $203.36 vs. SAND: $12.12)
Brand notoriety: FNV and SAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNV: 25% vs. SAND: 122%
Market capitalization -- FNV: $39.09B vs. SAND: $3.45B
FNV [@Precious Metals] is valued at $39.09B. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNV is a better buy in the long-term than SAND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNV is a better buy in the short-term than SAND.

Price Growth

FNV (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.28% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNV is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2026.

SAND is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.71% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNV($39.1B) has a higher market cap than SAND($3.45B). SAND has higher P/E ratio than FNV: SAND (101.00) vs FNV (42.52). SAND YTD gains are higher at: 117.204 vs. FNV (74.121). FNV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.25B vs. SAND (145M). FNV has more cash in the bank: 788M vs. SAND (14.8M). FNV has less debt than SAND: FNV (82.6M) vs SAND (315M). FNV has higher revenues than SAND: FNV (1.33B) vs SAND (194M).
FNVSANDFNV / SAND
Capitalization39.1B3.45B1,134%
EBITDA1.25B145M861%
Gain YTD74.121117.20463%
P/E Ratio42.52101.0042%
Revenue1.33B194M688%
Total Cash788M14.8M5,324%
Total Debt82.6M315M26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNV vs SAND: Fundamental Ratings
FNV
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3650
SMR RATING
1..100
6188
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5610
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNV's Valuation (20) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAND (79) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

FNV's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SAND (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

FNV's SMR Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SAND (88) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

FNV's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SAND (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNV (56) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNVSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYD10.400.05
+0.48%
Blackrock Muniyield Fund
UPRO116.050.56
+0.48%
ProShares UltraPro S&P500
BKWO37.72N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Womens's Opportunities ETF
GXIG25.69-0.05
-0.19%
Global X Investment Grade Corp Bd ETF
DOG23.93-0.09
-0.40%
ProShares Short Dow30

FNV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNV has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNV jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNV
1D Price
Change %
FNV100%
-1.82%
AEM - FNV
88%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
WPM - FNV
87%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
RGLD - FNV
81%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
AGI - FNV
80%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
KGC - FNV
80%
Closely correlated
-3.00%
More

SAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAND has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAND jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAND
1D Price
Change %
SAND100%
N/A
WPM - SAND
71%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
AEM - SAND
71%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
AGI - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
FNV - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
OR - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
More