FNV
Price
$161.32
Change
-$3.40 (-2.06%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
22.83B
38 days until earnings call
SAND
Price
$9.03
Change
-$0.28 (-3.01%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.56B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNV vs SAND

Header iconFNV vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts FNV vs SANDBanner chart's image
Franco-Nevada
Price$161.32
Change-$3.40 (-2.06%)
Volume$1.26M
Capitalization22.83B
Sandstorm Gold
Price$9.03
Change-$0.28 (-3.01%)
Volume$3.68M
Capitalization1.56B
FNV vs SAND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNV vs. SAND commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNV is a Buy and SAND is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FNV: $161.32 vs. SAND: $9.03)
Brand notoriety: FNV and SAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNV: 146% vs. SAND: 73%
Market capitalization -- FNV: $22.83B vs. SAND: $1.56B
FNV [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.83B. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNV is a better buy in the long-term than SAND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FNV and SAND are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FNV (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.70% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNV is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SAND is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNV($22.8B) has a higher market cap than SAND($1.56B). SAND has higher P/E ratio than FNV: SAND (37.43) vs FNV (32.33). SAND YTD gains are higher at: 61.828 vs. FNV (37.861). SAND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 162M vs. FNV (-91M). FNV has more cash in the bank: 1.42B vs. SAND (14.8M). FNV has less debt than SAND: FNV (82.6M) vs SAND (435M). FNV has higher revenues than SAND: FNV (1.22B) vs SAND (180M).
FNVSANDFNV / SAND
Capitalization22.8B1.56B1,464%
EBITDA-91M162M-56%
Gain YTD37.86161.82861%
P/E Ratio32.3337.4386%
Revenue1.22B180M677%
Total Cash1.42B14.8M9,608%
Total Debt82.6M435M19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNV vs SAND: Fundamental Ratings
FNV
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6170
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6093
SMR RATING
1..100
7187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5419
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNV's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAND (67) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

FNV's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAND (93) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

FNV's SMR Rating (71) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SAND (87) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FNV (46) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNV (54) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNVSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DJP34.240.06
+0.18%
iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN
KBWB71.120.09
+0.13%
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
RILA11.12N/A
+0.02%
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF
AFIF9.30N/A
+0.01%
Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF
JHMU25.50N/A
N/A
JHancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF

FNV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNV has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNV jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNV
1D Price
Change %
FNV100%
-2.06%
WPM - FNV
84%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
AEM - FNV
83%
Closely correlated
-5.63%
RGLD - FNV
78%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
AGI - FNV
77%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
SAND - FNV
72%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
More

SAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAND has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAND jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAND
1D Price
Change %
SAND100%
-3.01%
AEM - SAND
77%
Closely correlated
-5.63%
AGI - SAND
76%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
WPM - SAND
76%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
PAAS - SAND
73%
Closely correlated
-4.84%
NGD - SAND
73%
Closely correlated
-3.65%
More