Advertisement
FNTTF vs QBTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNTTF is a Hold and QBTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FNTTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQBTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FNTTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- QBTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FNTTF (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -17.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
QBTS is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-4.91% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| FNTTF | QBTS | FNTTF / QBTS | |
| Capitalization | 4.17M | 8.19B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -3.05M | -277.43M | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 122.145 | 214.286 | 57% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 697K | 22.3M | 3% |
| Total Cash | 6.91K | 819M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 5.67M | 40M | 14% |
| FNTTF | QBTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LDUR | 96.00 | 0.03 | +0.03% |
| PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | |||
| AUDJPY | 100.63 | N/A | N/A |
| Australian Dollar - Japan Yen | |||
| CNYAUD | 0.22 | N/A | N/A |
| China Yuan - Australian Dollar | |||
| XUSP | 47.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Uncapped Accelerated US Eq ETF | |||
| CHIQ | 23.09 | -0.16 | -0.69% |
| Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF | |||
FNTTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FNTTF and QBTS have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNTTF and QBTS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNTTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNTTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| QBTS - FNTTF | 6% Poorly correlated | -8.93% | ||
| RGTI - FNTTF | 3% Poorly correlated | -9.87% | ||
| IONQ - FNTTF | -2% Poorly correlated | -6.82% | ||
| CCUR - FNTTF | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRCT - FNTTF | -10% Poorly correlated | -1.04% |
QBTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | -8.93% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 72% Closely correlated | -9.87% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 71% Closely correlated | -6.70% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -6.82% | ||
| QMCO - QBTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| UMAC - QBTS | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||