Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNSFX vs MFJAX
FNSFX vs MFJAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSFX vs. MFJAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSFX is a Hold and MFJAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNSFX has more cash in the bank: 8.36B vs. MFJAX (266M). MFJAX pays higher dividends than FNSFX: MFJAX (2.06) vs FNSFX (1.29). FNSFX was incepted earlier than MFJAX: FNSFX (9 years) vs MFJAX (9 years). MFJAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FNSFX (0.65). FNSFX (18.00) and MFJAX (18.00) have comparable annual turnover. FNSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJAX: FNSFX (0) vs MFJAX (1000). FNSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.47 vs. MFJAX (11.36). MFJAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.06 vs. FNSFX (32.84).
| FNSFX | MFJAX | FNSFX / MFJAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.82 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.16 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.408 | 3.525 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.36B | 266M | 3,144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 2.06 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.47 | 11.36 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.80 | 36.79 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.84 | 36.06 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers