Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPIX vs RYCCX
FNPIX vs RYCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPIX vs. RYCCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPIX is a Hold and RYCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RYCCX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. FNPIX (8.91M). FNPIX (0.00) and RYCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FNPIX was incepted earlier than RYCCX: FNPIX (26 years) vs RYCCX (25 years). RYCCX (2.62) is less costly to investors than FNPIX (1.67). RYCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 383.00 vs. FNPIX (313.00). RYCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPIX: RYCCX (2500) vs FNPIX (15000). RYCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.15 vs. FNPIX (14.43). FNPIX return over 5 years is better than : 90.19 vs. RYCCX (85.00).
| FNPIX | RYCCX | FNPIX / RYCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.50 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.62 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.947 | 1.463 | -133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.91M | 1.46B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.43 | 21.15 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.15 | 198.23 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.19 | 85.00 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 289.66 | 761.20 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement