Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPIX vs RYCCX
FNPIX vs RYCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPIX vs. RYCCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPIX is a Hold and RYCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RYCCX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. FNPIX (12.6M). FNPIX pays higher dividends than RYCCX: FNPIX (0.43) vs RYCCX (0.00). FNPIX was incepted earlier than RYCCX: FNPIX (26 years) vs RYCCX (25 years). RYCCX (2.62) is less costly to investors than FNPIX (1.67). RYCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 383.00 vs. FNPIX (313.00). RYCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPIX: RYCCX (2500) vs FNPIX (15000). FNPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.17 vs. RYCCX (11.33). FNPIX return over 5 years is better than : 110.14 vs. RYCCX (90.61).
| FNPIX | RYCCX | FNPIX / RYCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.50 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.62 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.655 | 20.033 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6M | 1.55B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.17 | 11.33 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.71 | 233.21 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.14 | 90.61 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 242.43 | 599.58 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement