Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs WAGSX
FNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.72
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.83M
FNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a StrongBuy and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. WAGSX (12.8M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: FNPFX (0.78) vs WAGSX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: FNPFX (9 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). WAGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: WAGSX (2000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.06 vs. WAGSX (6.44). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.95 vs. WAGSX (1.92).
| FNPFX | WAGSX | FNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.36 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.57 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.636 | 5.385 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 12.8M | 1,242,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.06 | 6.44 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.49 | 20.11 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.95 | 1.92 | 2,077% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement