Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs SCMGX
FNPFX vs SCMGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs SCMGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Sands Capital Global Growth Inst
Price$34.45
Change+$0.19 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
FNPFX vs SCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. SCMGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and SCMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. SCMGX (1.18B). FNPFX pays higher dividends than SCMGX: FNPFX (0.79) vs SCMGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than SCMGX: FNPFX (9 years) vs SCMGX (15 years). SCMGX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCMGX (17.00). FNPFX (1000000) and SCMGX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SCMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.12 vs. FNPFX (17.43). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.38 vs. SCMGX (6.13).
| FNPFX | SCMGX | FNPFX / SCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.96 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.96 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 14.111 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.18B | 13,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 19.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 54.62 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.38 | 6.13 | 724% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement