Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs SCGVX
FNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs SCGVX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$67.59
Change-$0.81 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.4B
Sands Capital Global Growth I
Price$31.83
Change-$0.50 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
FNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. SCGVX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and SCGVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. SCGVX (1.13B). FNPFX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: FNPFX (0.82) vs SCGVX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: FNPFX (8 years) vs SCGVX (15 years). SCGVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCGVX (17.00). SCGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: SCGVX (100000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. SCGVX (7.64). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.86 vs. SCGVX (8.04).
| FNPFX | SCGVX | FNPFX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.21 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.21 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.841 | 8.746 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 1.13B | 13,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.28 | 7.64 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | 57.57 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.86 | 8.04 | 620% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.06 | - |