Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs SCGVX
FNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs SCGVX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Sands Capital Global Growth I
Price$33.37
Change+$0.19 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
FNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. SCGVX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. SCGVX (1.18B). FNPFX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: FNPFX (0.79) vs SCGVX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: FNPFX (9 years) vs SCGVX (15 years). SCGVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCGVX (17.00). SCGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: SCGVX (100000) vs FNPFX (1000000). SCGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.63 vs. FNPFX (17.43). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.38 vs. SCGVX (4.61).
| FNPFX | SCGVX | FNPFX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.21 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.21 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 14.008 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.18B | 13,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 18.63 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 53.28 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.38 | 4.61 | 963% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement