Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs RGPAX
FNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.14
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$23.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets486.75M
FNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and RGPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. RGPAX (487M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: FNPFX (0.75) vs RGPAX (0.35). FNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: FNPFX (9 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). RGPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: RGPAX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. RGPAX (11.55). RGPAX (36.98) and FNPFX (36.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNPFX | RGPAX | FNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.00 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 8.20 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.388 | 14.065 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 487M | 33,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.35 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.16 | 11.55 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.67 | 54.43 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.71 | 36.98 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement