Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs RGCEX
FNPFX vs RGCEX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs RGCEX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$70.26
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
Columbia Select Global Equity C
Price$16.52
Change+$0.15 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets744.49M
FNPFX vs RGCEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. RGCEX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and RGCEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. RGCEX (744M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than RGCEX: FNPFX (0.79) vs RGCEX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than RGCEX: FNPFX (8 years) vs RGCEX (25 years). RGCEX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). RGCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). RGCEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: RGCEX (2000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. RGCEX (1.10). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.56 vs. RGCEX (19.45).
| FNPFX | RGCEX | FNPFX / RGCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.97 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.140 | 9.695 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 744M | 20,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 1.10 | 1,056% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 40.00 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.56 | 19.45 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement