Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs PGRCX
FNPFX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs PGRCX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$55.41
Change+$0.15 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
FNPFX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. PGRCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and PGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. PGRCX (1.04B). FNPFX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: FNPFX (0.79) vs PGRCX (0.02). FNPFX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: FNPFX (9 years) vs PGRCX (30 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). PGRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: PGRCX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.43 vs. PGRCX (-3.58). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.38 vs. PGRCX (13.99).
| FNPFX | PGRCX | FNPFX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.89 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.89 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 7.970 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.04B | 15,236% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.02 | 4,840% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | -3.58 | -486% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 11.93 | 386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.38 | 13.99 | 317% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement