Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs OWLSX
FNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs OWLSX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$72.19
Change-$0.45 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
Price$23.16
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.16B
FNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. OWLSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and OWLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. OWLSX (26.2B). FNPFX pays higher dividends than OWLSX: FNPFX (1.32) vs OWLSX (0.35). FNPFX was incepted earlier than OWLSX: FNPFX (9 years) vs OWLSX (32 years). OWLSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). OWLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). OWLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: OWLSX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX (18.54) and OWLSX (17.74) have marching annual gain over last year. OWLSX return over 5 years is better than : 35.16 vs. FNPFX (21.77).
| FNPFX | OWLSX | FNPFX / OWLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.09 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.09 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.223 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 26.2B | 622% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.35 | 372% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.54 | 17.74 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.67 | 53.05 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.77 | 35.16 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers