Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs OWLSX
FNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs OWLSX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
Price$21.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.5B
FNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. OWLSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and OWLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. OWLSX (25.5B). FNPFX pays higher dividends than OWLSX: FNPFX (0.79) vs OWLSX (0.38). FNPFX was incepted earlier than OWLSX: FNPFX (9 years) vs OWLSX (32 years). OWLSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). OWLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). OWLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: OWLSX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.43 vs. OWLSX (12.94). OWLSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.96 vs. FNPFX (44.38).
| FNPFX | OWLSX | FNPFX / OWLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.09 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.09 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 10.489 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 25.5B | 620% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.38 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 12.94 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 52.54 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.38 | 50.96 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement