Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs NBSSX
FNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$75.47
Change+$0.25 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$36.63
Change+$0.20 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets816.2M
FNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. NBSSX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. NBSSX (816M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: FNPFX (0.74) vs NBSSX (0.10). FNPFX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: FNPFX (9 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). NBSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: NBSSX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.61 vs. FNPFX (11.81). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.62 vs. NBSSX (22.17).
| FNPFX | NBSSX | FNPFX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.530 | 20.533 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 816M | 19,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.10 | 770% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.81 | 15.61 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.60 | 76.34 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.62 | 22.17 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers