Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs NBSSX
FNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$35.25
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets837.04M
FNPFX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. NBSSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. NBSSX (837M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: FNPFX (0.79) vs NBSSX (0.10). FNPFX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: FNPFX (9 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). NBSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: NBSSX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.21 vs. FNPFX (17.43). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.38 vs. NBSSX (32.97).
| FNPFX | NBSSX | FNPFX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.91 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 15.992 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 837M | 18,877% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.10 | 776% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 26.21 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 71.58 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.38 | 32.97 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement