Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MWOFX
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$70.26
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$64.91
Change+$0.33 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets952.31M
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. MWOFX (952M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: FNPFX (0.79) vs MWOFX (0.01). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. MWOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MWOFX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. MWOFX (2.37). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.56 vs. MWOFX (34.64).
| FNPFX | MWOFX | FNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.22 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.32 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.140 | 5.373 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 952M | 16,387% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.01 | 13,383% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 2.37 | 490% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 27.25 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.56 | 34.64 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement