Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MWOFX
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.14
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.59B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$65.33
Change+$0.24 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets926.54M
FNPFX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MWOFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and MWOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MWOFX (927M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: FNPFX (0.75) vs MWOFX (0.01). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MWOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MWOFX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.37 vs. MWOFX (-2.63). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.45 vs. MWOFX (20.50).
| FNPFX | MWOFX | FNPFX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.22 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.32 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.163 | 5.666 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 927M | 17,584% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.01 | 12,959% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.37 | -2.63 | -509% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.80 | 37.73 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.45 | 20.50 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement