Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MLMCX
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MLMCX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.38
Change-$0.39 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$22.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.49M
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MLMCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MLMCX (56.5M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: FNPFX (1.29) vs MLMCX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MLMCX (10 years). MLMCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.40). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FNPFX (23.00). MLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MLMCX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.35 vs. MLMCX (11.89). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.35 vs. FNPFX (18.39).
| FNPFX | MLMCX | FNPFX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.10 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.80 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.628 | 0.534 | 305% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 56.5M | 288,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.35 | 11.89 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.00 | 47.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.39 | 37.35 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |