Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MLMCX
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MLMCX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$70.26
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$21.31
Change+$0.17 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.79M
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MLMCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. MLMCX (44.8M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: FNPFX (0.79) vs MLMCX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MLMCX (9 years). MLMCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MLMCX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). MLMCX (11.98) and FNPFX (11.63) have marching annual gain over last year. MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 71.99 vs. FNPFX (47.56).
| FNPFX | MLMCX | FNPFX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.10 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.80 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.140 | 8.008 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 44.8M | 348,214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 11.98 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 59.75 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.56 | 71.99 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement