Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MLMCX
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MLMCX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$22.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.72M
FNPFX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MLMCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MLMCX (53.7M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: FNPFX (0.74) vs MLMCX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MLMCX (10 years). MLMCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MLMCX (1000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. MLMCX (10.64). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.87 vs. FNPFX (26.08).
| FNPFX | MLMCX | FNPFX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.10 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.80 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.483 | 15.915 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 53.7M | 303,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.39 | 10.64 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.28 | 59.04 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.08 | 49.87 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement