Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MGLBX
FNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$67.59
Change-$0.81 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
Marsico Global
Price$29.10
Change-$0.43 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets416.75M
FNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MGLBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. MGLBX (417M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: FNPFX (0.82) vs MGLBX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MGLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MGLBX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.81 vs. FNPFX (9.28). MGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.84 vs. FNPFX (49.86).
| FNPFX | MGLBX | FNPFX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.44 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.841 | 13.761 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 417M | 36,211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.28 | 21.81 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | 105.07 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.86 | 52.84 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement