Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MECVX
FNPFX vs MECVX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MECVX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Investor Class
Price$15.88
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.4M
FNPFX vs MECVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MECVX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MECVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MECVX (149M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MECVX: FNPFX (0.79) vs MECVX (0.10). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MECVX: FNPFX (9 years) vs MECVX (9 years). MECVX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MECVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MECVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MECVX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.43 vs. MECVX (8.36). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.38 vs. MECVX (13.24).
| FNPFX | MECVX | FNPFX / MECVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.41 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.41 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 8.248 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 149M | 106,040% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.10 | 792% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 8.36 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 50.28 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.38 | 13.24 | 335% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement