Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs LSGGX
FNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$24.08
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.52M
FNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSGGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LSGGX (135M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: FNPFX (0.79) vs LSGGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: FNPFX (9 years) vs LSGGX (9 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). LSGGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSGGX (100000) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.31 vs. FNPFX (17.43). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.46 vs. FNPFX (44.38).
| FNPFX | LSGGX | FNPFX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.13 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 15.050 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 135M | 117,037% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 32.31 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 73.61 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.38 | 47.46 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement