Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs LSCGX
FNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.55
Change+$0.14 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.52M
FNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSCGX (134M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: FNPFX (0.74) vs LSCGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: FNPFX (9 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). LSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSCGX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. FNPFX (11.96). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.20 vs. LSCGX (19.77).
| FNPFX | LSCGX | FNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.95 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.13 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.533 | 15.469 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 134M | 121,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.96 | 12.82 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.12 | 64.34 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.20 | 19.77 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers