Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs LSCGX
FNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$21.96
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.52M
FNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LSCGX (135M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: FNPFX (0.79) vs LSCGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: FNPFX (9 years) vs LSCGX (9 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). LSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSCGX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.03 vs. FNPFX (17.43). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.38 vs. LSCGX (38.99).
| FNPFX | LSCGX | FNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.95 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.13 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | 14.375 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 135M | 117,037% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 31.03 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 67.89 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.38 | 38.99 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement