Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs LSAGX
FNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSAGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$70.26
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
Price$23.25
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.75M
FNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. LSAGX (131M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: FNPFX (0.79) vs LSAGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: FNPFX (8 years) vs LSAGX (9 years). LSAGX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSAGX (6.00). LSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSAGX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.02 vs. FNPFX (11.63). FNPFX (47.56) and LSAGX (46.50) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNPFX | LSAGX | FNPFX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.20 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.140 | 13.084 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 131M | 119,084% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 23.02 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 75.47 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.56 | 46.50 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement