Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs LSAGX
FNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSAGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$74.25
Change-$1.24 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
Price$23.81
Change-$0.55 (-2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.25M
FNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSAGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. LSAGX (130M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: FNPFX (0.73) vs LSAGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: FNPFX (9 years) vs LSAGX (10 years). LSAGX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSAGX (6.00). LSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSAGX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.91 vs. FNPFX (13.46). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.30 vs. LSAGX (28.91).
| FNPFX | LSAGX | FNPFX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.20 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.565 | 15.807 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 130M | 126,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.46 | 14.91 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.76 | 76.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.30 | 28.91 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement