FNNNF
Price
$3.40
Change
+$0.32 (+10.39%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
703.05M
QUBSF
Price
$6.74
Change
-$0.12 (-1.75%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNNNF vs QUBSF

Header iconFNNNF vs QUBSF Comparison
Open Charts FNNNF vs QUBSFBanner chart's image
Finnair OYJ
Price$3.40
Change+$0.32 (+10.39%)
Volume$8.5K
Capitalization703.05M
Qantas Airways
Price$6.74
Change-$0.12 (-1.75%)
Volume$554
Capitalization10.83B
FNNNF vs QUBSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNNNF vs. QUBSF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNNNF is a Hold and QUBSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FNNNF: $3.40 vs. QUBSF: $6.74)
Brand notoriety: FNNNF and QUBSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNNNF: 185% vs. QUBSF: 24%
Market capitalization -- FNNNF: $703.05M vs. QUBSF: $10.83B
FNNNF [@Airlines] is valued at $703.05M. QUBSF’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $10.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $35.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $7.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNNNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FNNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QUBSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUBSF is a better buy in the long-term than FNNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNNNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNNNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QUBSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNNF is a better buy in the short-term than QUBSF.

Price Growth

FNNNF (@Airlines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QUBSF (@Airlines) price change was -4.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+0.59% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUBSF($10.8B) has a higher market cap than FNNNF($703M). FNNNF has higher P/E ratio than QUBSF: FNNNF (57.76) vs QUBSF (12.33). FNNNF YTD gains are higher at: 44.681 vs. QUBSF (30.015). QUBSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.2B vs. FNNNF (446M). QUBSF has higher revenues than FNNNF: QUBSF (22.6B) vs FNNNF (3.06B).
FNNNFQUBSFFNNNF / QUBSF
Capitalization703M10.8B7%
EBITDA446M4.2B11%
Gain YTD44.68130.015149%
P/E Ratio57.7612.33468%
Revenue3.06B22.6B14%
Total Cash918MN/A-
Total Debt1.72BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNNF vs QUBSF: Fundamental Ratings
FNNNF
QUBSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
8610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QUBSF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNNF (87). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNNF (100). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNNF (86). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNNF (45). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNNF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBSF (10). This means that FNNNF’s stock grew similarly to QUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNNNFQUBSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSDAX32.670.23
+0.71%
DWS Small Cap Growth A
MSVZX9.470.06
+0.64%
MassMutual Small Company Val I
ECTVX40.720.15
+0.37%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Value C
HBLSX14.930.03
+0.20%
Hartford Balanced Income R4
MGLRX16.67-0.04
-0.24%
MFS Global Real Estate R6

FNNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNNF and NWARF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNNF and NWARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNNF
1D Price
Change %
FNNNF100%
N/A
NWARF - FNNNF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
RYAOF - FNNNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JETMF - FNNNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
QABSY - FNNNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
QUBSF - FNNNF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QUBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUBSF and QABSY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUBSF and QABSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUBSF
1D Price
Change %
QUBSF100%
N/A
QABSY - QUBSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
RYAOF - QUBSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWARF - QUBSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
JETMF - QUBSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
JPNRF - QUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More