FNNNF
Price
$3.75
Change
+$0.35 (+10.29%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
697.37M
QUBSF
Price
$7.47
Change
-$0.33 (-4.23%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
10.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNNNF vs QUBSF

Header iconFNNNF vs QUBSF Comparison
Open Charts FNNNF vs QUBSFBanner chart's image
Finnair OYJ
Price$3.75
Change+$0.35 (+10.29%)
Volume$325
Capitalization697.37M
Qantas Airways
Price$7.47
Change-$0.33 (-4.23%)
Volume$105
Capitalization10.88B
FNNNF vs QUBSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNNNF vs. QUBSF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNNNF is a Buy and QUBSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FNNNF: $3.75 vs. QUBSF: $7.47)
Brand notoriety: FNNNF and QUBSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNNNF: 9% vs. QUBSF: 7%
Market capitalization -- FNNNF: $697.37M vs. QUBSF: $10.88B
FNNNF [@Airlines] is valued at $697.37M. QUBSF’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $10.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $37.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNNNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FNNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QUBSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUBSF is a better buy in the long-term than FNNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNNNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNNNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • QUBSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNNF is a better buy in the short-term than QUBSF.

Price Growth

FNNNF (@Airlines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QUBSF (@Airlines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was -2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (-2.24% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUBSF($10.9B) has a higher market cap than FNNNF($697M). FNNNF has higher P/E ratio than QUBSF: FNNNF (63.86) vs QUBSF (10.91). FNNNF YTD gains are higher at: 59.574 vs. QUBSF (44.194). QUBSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.54B vs. FNNNF (433M). QUBSF has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. FNNNF (767M). FNNNF has less debt than QUBSF: FNNNF (1.58B) vs QUBSF (7.96B). QUBSF has higher revenues than FNNNF: QUBSF (23.4B) vs FNNNF (3.08B).
FNNNFQUBSFFNNNF / QUBSF
Capitalization697M10.9B6%
EBITDA433M4.54B10%
Gain YTD59.57444.194135%
P/E Ratio63.8610.91585%
Revenue3.08B23.4B13%
Total Cash767M2.36B32%
Total Debt1.58B7.96B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNNF vs QUBSF: Fundamental Ratings
FNNNF
QUBSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10012
SMR RATING
1..100
909
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
133
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNNF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBSF (80). This means that FNNNF’s stock grew similarly to QUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNNF (100). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNNF (90). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNNF (48). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNNF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBSF (33). This means that FNNNF’s stock grew similarly to QUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNNNFQUBSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LXEO6.770.27
+4.15%
Lexeo Therapeutics
LKFN65.771.33
+2.06%
Lakeland Financial Corp
SELF5.060.06
+1.20%
Global Self Storage
HQY96.530.37
+0.38%
HealthEquity
BAYAU11.35N/A
N/A
Bayview Acquisition Corp

FNNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNNF and NWARF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNNF and NWARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNNF
1D Price
Change %
FNNNF100%
N/A
NWARF - FNNNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
RYAOF - FNNNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JETMF - FNNNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
QABSY - FNNNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
QUBSF - FNNNF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QUBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUBSF and QABSY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUBSF and QABSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUBSF
1D Price
Change %
QUBSF100%
N/A
QABSY - QUBSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
RYAOF - QUBSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWARF - QUBSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
JETMF - QUBSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
JPNRF - QUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More