FNNNF
Price
$3.75
Change
+$0.35 (+10.29%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
697.37M
QABSY
Price
$36.30
Change
+$0.70 (+1.97%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.88B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNNNF vs QABSY

Header iconFNNNF vs QABSY Comparison
Open Charts FNNNF vs QABSYBanner chart's image
Finnair OYJ
Price$3.75
Change+$0.35 (+10.29%)
Volume$325
Capitalization697.37M
Qantas Airways
Price$36.30
Change+$0.70 (+1.97%)
Volume$10.49K
Capitalization10.88B
FNNNF vs QABSY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QABSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNNNF vs. QABSY commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNNNF is a Buy and QABSY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FNNNF: $3.75 vs. QABSY: $36.29)
Brand notoriety: FNNNF and QABSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNNNF: 9% vs. QABSY: 108%
Market capitalization -- FNNNF: $697.37M vs. QABSY: $10.88B
FNNNF [@Airlines] is valued at $697.37M. QABSY’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $10.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $37.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNNNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQABSY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QABSY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QABSY is a better buy in the long-term than FNNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNNNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QABSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNNNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • QABSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNNF is a better buy in the short-term than QABSY.

Price Growth

FNNNF (@Airlines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QABSY (@Airlines) price change was -1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was -2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

QABSY is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (-2.24% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QABSY($10.9B) has a higher market cap than FNNNF($697M). FNNNF has higher P/E ratio than QABSY: FNNNF (63.86) vs QABSY (10.60). FNNNF YTD gains are higher at: 59.574 vs. QABSY (37.031).
FNNNFQABSYFNNNF / QABSY
Capitalization697M10.9B6%
EBITDA433MN/A-
Gain YTD59.57437.031161%
P/E Ratio63.8610.60603%
Revenue3.08BN/A-
Total Cash767MN/A-
Total Debt1.58BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNNF vs QABSY: Fundamental Ratings
FNNNF
QABSY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
909
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
139
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
506

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNNF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as QABSY (79). This means that FNNNF’s stock grew similarly to QABSY’s over the last 12 months.

QABSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNNF (100). This means that QABSY’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

QABSY's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNNF (90). This means that QABSY’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

QABSY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNNF (48). This means that QABSY’s stock grew similarly to FNNNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNNF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QABSY (39). This means that FNNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QABSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNNNFQABSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QABSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSK129.972.49
+1.95%
Oshkosh Corp
ACCO4.060.05
+1.25%
Acco Brands Corp
ISRLU11.60N/A
N/A
Israel Acquisitions Corp
ZIM13.94-0.14
-0.99%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd
TELA1.45-0.03
-2.03%
TELA Bio

FNNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNNF and NWARF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNNF and NWARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNNF
1D Price
Change %
FNNNF100%
N/A
NWARF - FNNNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
RYAOF - FNNNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JETMF - FNNNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
QABSY - FNNNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
QUBSF - FNNNF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QABSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QABSY has been loosely correlated with DLAKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QABSY jumps, then DLAKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QABSY
1D Price
Change %
QABSY100%
+1.98%
DLAKY - QABSY
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
ESYJY - QABSY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
JAPSY - QABSY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
ACDVF - QABSY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
AFLYY - QABSY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More