FNNCF
Price
$7.12
Change
+$0.12 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
270.04M
WT
Price
$12.48
Change
+$0.23 (+1.88%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.38B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNNCF vs WT

Header iconFNNCF vs WT Comparison
Open Charts FNNCF vs WTBanner chart's image
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.12
Change+$0.12 (+1.71%)
Volume$300
Capitalization270.04M
WisdomTree
Price$12.48
Change+$0.23 (+1.88%)
Volume$3.07M
Capitalization1.38B
FNNCF vs WT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNNCF vs. WT commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNNCF is a Hold and WT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FNNCF: $7.12 vs. WT: $12.48)
Brand notoriety: FNNCF: Not notable vs. WT: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNNCF: 85% vs. WT: 173%
Market capitalization -- FNNCF: $270.04M vs. WT: $1.38B
FNNCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $270.04M. WT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNNCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the long-term than FNNCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNNCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FNNCF and WT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FNNCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.75% price change this week, while WT (@Investment Managers) price change was +12.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

WT is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WT($1.38B) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($270M). WT YTD gains are higher at: 19.600 vs. FNNCF (10.942). WT has higher revenues than FNNCF: WT (349M) vs FNNCF (-2.58M).
FNNCFWTFNNCF / WT
Capitalization270M1.38B20%
EBITDAN/A136M-
Gain YTD10.94219.60056%
P/E RatioN/A14.19-
Revenue-2.58M349M-1%
Total CashN/A188M-
Total DebtN/A275M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNCF vs WT: Fundamental Ratings
FNNCF
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10018
SMR RATING
1..100
9359
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
938
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNCF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WT (48) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WT’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNCF (100) in the null industry. This means that WT’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

WT's SMR Rating (59) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNNCF (93) in the null industry. This means that WT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FNNCF (44) in the null industry. This means that WT’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

WT's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNCF (93) in the null industry. This means that WT’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNNCFWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFCNX22.850.31
+1.38%
Emerald Insights Investor
LGOQX24.780.30
+1.23%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R2
GTSDX8.940.10
+1.13%
Invesco Small Cap Growth C
GGGAX63.110.59
+0.94%
Gabelli Global Growth A
TESIX26.390.10
+0.38%
Franklin Mutual Shares A

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and BUR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and BUR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
+1.75%
BUR - FNNCF
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRBG - FNNCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
WT - FNNCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
AIMFF - FNNCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
More

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WT jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
+1.88%
JHG - WT
68%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
CG - WT
68%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
AMG - WT
67%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
IVZ - WT
66%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
BN - WT
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
More