FNNCF
Price
$7.96
Change
-$0.09 (-1.12%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
593M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TPG
Price
$58.21
Change
-$0.70 (-1.19%)
Updated
Feb 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.02B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNNCF vs TPG

Header iconFNNCF vs TPG Comparison
Open Charts FNNCF vs TPGBanner chart's image
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.96
Change-$0.09 (-1.12%)
Volume$7.96K
Capitalization593M
TPG
Price$58.21
Change-$0.70 (-1.19%)
Volume$50.05K
Capitalization9.02B
FNNCF vs TPG Comparison Chart in %
FNNCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNNCF vs. TPG commentary
Feb 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNNCF is a Hold and TPG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FNNCF: $7.96 vs. TPG: $58.91)
Brand notoriety: FNNCF and TPG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNNCF: 439% vs. TPG: 92%
Market capitalization -- FNNCF: $593M vs. TPG: $8.91B
FNNCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $593M. TPG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $173.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNNCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTPG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TPG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNNCF is a better buy in the long-term than TPG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNNCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TPG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNCF is a better buy in the short-term than TPG.

Price Growth

FNNCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while TPG (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

TPG is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.99% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TPG($9.02B) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($593M). TPG has higher P/E ratio than FNNCF: TPG (589.10) vs FNNCF (4.05). FNNCF YTD gains are higher at: -0.500 vs. TPG (-7.722). TPG has higher revenues than FNNCF: TPG (2.92B) vs FNNCF (237M).
FNNCFTPGFNNCF / TPG
Capitalization593M9.02B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.500-7.7226%
P/E Ratio4.05589.101%
Revenue237M2.92B8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNCF: Fundamental Ratings
FNNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
26
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNNCFTPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNNCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNVIX19.99-0.02
-0.10%
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value I
OALGX20.61-0.19
-0.91%
Optimum Large Cap Growth A
VVONX25.49-0.42
-1.62%
Invesco Value Opportunities R5
MXXIX58.62-1.41
-2.35%
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund
UUPSX80.10-4.95
-5.82%
ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Svc

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and TPG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and TPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
-1.12%
TPG - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
PAX - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CG - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARES - FNNCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
More

TPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPG
1D Price
Change %
TPG100%
+0.08%
KKR - TPG
87%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
CG - TPG
87%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
ARES - TPG
83%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
BX - TPG
82%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
OWL - TPG
80%
Closely correlated
-2.50%
More