FNLPF
Price
$19.57
Change
-$1.13 (-5.46%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.86B
37 days until earnings call
KGC
Price
$14.87
Change
-$0.98 (-6.18%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.52B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLPF vs KGC

Header iconFNLPF vs KGC Comparison
Open Charts FNLPF vs KGCBanner chart's image
Fresnillo
Price$19.57
Change-$1.13 (-5.46%)
Volume$8.99K
Capitalization5.86B
Kinross Gold
Price$14.87
Change-$0.98 (-6.18%)
Volume$27.25M
Capitalization7.52B
FNLPF vs KGC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLPF vs. KGC commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLPF is a Hold and KGC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLPF: $19.58 vs. KGC: $14.87)
Brand notoriety: FNLPF: Not notable vs. KGC: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLPF: 83% vs. KGC: 128%
Market capitalization -- FNLPF: $5.86B vs. KGC: $7.52B
FNLPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.86B. KGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FNLPF and KGC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNLPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KGC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNLPF is a better buy in the short-term than KGC.

Price Growth

FNLPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNLPF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

KGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($7.52B) has a higher market cap than FNLPF($5.86B). FNLPF has higher P/E ratio than KGC: FNLPF (25.19) vs KGC (18.12). FNLPF YTD gains are higher at: 161.775 vs. KGC (61.170). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. FNLPF (829M). KGC has more cash in the bank: 352M vs. FNLPF (2.56M). FNLPF has less debt than KGC: FNLPF (1.27B) vs KGC (2.26B). KGC has higher revenues than FNLPF: KGC (4.24B) vs FNLPF (2.43B).
FNLPFKGCFNLPF / KGC
Capitalization5.86B7.52B78%
EBITDA829M1.76B47%
Gain YTD161.77561.170264%
P/E Ratio25.1918.12139%
Revenue2.43B4.24B57%
Total Cash2.56M352M1%
Total Debt1.27B2.26B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLPF vs KGC: Fundamental Ratings
FNLPF
KGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5068
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3928
SMR RATING
1..100
9149
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
289
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLPF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as KGC (17) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNLPF (39) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to FNLPF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNLPF (91) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNLPF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as KGC (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KGC (89) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew significantly faster than KGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLPFKGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LEAD71.370.45
+0.64%
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
JHML72.940.38
+0.52%
JHancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
JSTC19.600.03
+0.13%
Adasina Social Justice All Cp Glbl ETF
CPSM27.82N/A
N/A
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-May
GGLS12.24-0.35
-2.78%
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X ETF

FNLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLPF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNLPF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLPF
1D Price
Change %
FNLPF100%
-5.46%
PAAS - FNLPF
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.84%
HL - FNLPF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
AU - FNLPF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KGC - FNLPF
41%
Loosely correlated
-6.18%
AEM - FNLPF
40%
Loosely correlated
-5.63%
More

KGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGC has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGC jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGC
1D Price
Change %
KGC100%
-6.18%
AEM - KGC
85%
Closely correlated
-5.63%
AGI - KGC
82%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
WPM - KGC
81%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
PAAS - KGC
76%
Closely correlated
-4.84%
NGD - KGC
75%
Closely correlated
-3.65%
More