FNLIF
Price
$27.63
Change
+$0.29 (+1.06%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.65B
MA
Price
$590.12
Change
+$4.68 (+0.80%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
446.3B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLIF vs MA

Header iconFNLIF vs MA Comparison
Open Charts FNLIF vs MABanner chart's image
First National Financial
Price$27.63
Change+$0.29 (+1.06%)
Volume$7.22K
Capitalization1.65B
Mastercard
Price$590.12
Change+$4.68 (+0.80%)
Volume$1.53M
Capitalization446.3B
FNLIF vs MA Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLIF vs. MA commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLIF is a Hold and MA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLIF: $27.63 vs. MA: $575.92)
Brand notoriety: FNLIF: Not notable vs. MA: Notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLIF: 300% vs. MA: 61%
Market capitalization -- FNLIF: $1.65B vs. MA: $446.3B
FNLIF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.65B. MA’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $446.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the long-term than FNLIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FNLIF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while MA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

MA is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.57% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MA($446B) has a higher market cap than FNLIF($1.65B). MA has higher P/E ratio than FNLIF: MA (40.44) vs FNLIF (12.33). MA YTD gains are higher at: 9.707 vs. FNLIF (-1.401). MA has more cash in the bank: 9.18B vs. FNLIF (631M). MA has less debt than FNLIF: MA (15.7B) vs FNLIF (38.8B). MA has higher revenues than FNLIF: MA (25.1B) vs FNLIF (504M).
FNLIFMAFNLIF / MA
Capitalization1.65B446B0%
EBITDAN/A15B-
Gain YTD-1.4019.707-14%
P/E Ratio12.3340.4430%
Revenue504M25.1B2%
Total Cash631M9.18B7%
Total Debt38.8B15.7B247%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLIF vs MA: Fundamental Ratings
FNLIF
MA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
608
SMR RATING
1..100
2211
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6030
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1534
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLIF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MA (94) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FNLIF’s stock grew significantly faster than MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNLIF (60) in the null industry. This means that MA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNLIF’s over the last 12 months.

MA's SMR Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FNLIF (22) in the null industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to FNLIF’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FNLIF (60) in the null industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to FNLIF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLIF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as MA (34) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FNLIF’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FNLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLIF has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNLIF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLIF
1D Price
Change %
FNLIF100%
N/A
ENVA - FNLIF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
MA - FNLIF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
WU - FNLIF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
FCRM - FNLIF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPRT - FNLIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
More

MA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MA has been closely correlated with V. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MA jumps, then V could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MA
1D Price
Change %
MA100%
+0.24%
V - MA
87%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
AXP - MA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
OBDC - MA
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
COF - MA
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
DFS - MA
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More