FNLC
Price
$25.66
Change
+$0.78 (+3.14%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
274.25M
MVBF
Price
$23.62
Change
-$0.10 (-0.42%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
283.06M
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLC vs MVBF

Header iconFNLC vs MVBF Comparison
Open Charts FNLC vs MVBFBanner chart's image
First Ban
Price$25.66
Change+$0.78 (+3.14%)
Volume$22.33K
Capitalization274.25M
MVB Financial
Price$23.62
Change-$0.10 (-0.42%)
Volume$47.4K
Capitalization283.06M
FNLC vs MVBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MVBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLC vs. MVBF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLC is a Hold and MVBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLC: $25.66 vs. MVBF: $23.62)
Brand notoriety: FNLC and MVBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLC: 100% vs. MVBF: 74%
Market capitalization -- FNLC: $274.25M vs. MVBF: $283.06M
FNLC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $274.25M. MVBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $283.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMVBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MVBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MVBF is a better buy in the long-term than FNLC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MVBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNLC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MVBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNLC is a better buy in the short-term than MVBF.

Price Growth

FNLC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.00% price change this week, while MVBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MVBF is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVBF($283M) and FNLC($274M) have the same market capitalization . MVBF has higher P/E ratio than FNLC: MVBF (12.82) vs FNLC (9.17). MVBF YTD gains are higher at: 16.154 vs. FNLC (-2.153). FNLC has more cash in the bank: 25.1M vs. MVBF (8.11M). FNLC has less debt than MVBF: FNLC (20.1M) vs MVBF (80.3M). MVBF has higher revenues than FNLC: MVBF (146M) vs FNLC (80.6M).
FNLCMVBFFNLC / MVBF
Capitalization274M283M97%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.15316.154-13%
P/E Ratio9.1712.8272%
Revenue80.6M146M55%
Total Cash25.1M8.11M310%
Total Debt20.1M80.3M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLC vs MVBF: Fundamental Ratings
FNLC
MVBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7323
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3763
SMR RATING
1..100
4035
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8131
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MVBF (50). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to MVBF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLC's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MVBF (63). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to MVBF’s over the last 12 months.

MVBF's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (40). This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

MVBF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (56). This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

MVBF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNLC (81). This means that MVBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLCMVBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MVBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRDC0.20N/A
N/A
Laredo Oil, Inc
NPONF469.64N/A
N/A
Nippon Prologis Reit Inc
MJGCF0.11N/A
-1.49%
Majestic Gold Corp.
SVNDY13.43-0.23
-1.65%
Seven & I Holdings Co., Ltd.
MRCHF22.10-0.73
-3.20%
Miraca Holdings, Inc.

FNLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLC has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNLC jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLC
1D Price
Change %
FNLC100%
+3.14%
CTBI - FNLC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
CVBF - FNLC
81%
Closely correlated
-2.48%
CHCO - FNLC
81%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
AROW - FNLC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
MBWM - FNLC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
More

MVBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MVBF has been closely correlated with RBCAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MVBF jumps, then RBCAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MVBF
1D Price
Change %
MVBF100%
-0.42%
RBCAA - MVBF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
CVBF - MVBF
77%
Closely correlated
-2.48%
MBWM - MVBF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
CTBI - MVBF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
FNLC - MVBF
76%
Closely correlated
+3.14%
More