FNLC
Price
$25.41
Change
-$0.32 (-1.24%)
Updated
Nov 14, 10:57 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
288.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$45.55
Change
-$0.12 (-0.26%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
740.19M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLC vs MBWM

Header iconFNLC vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts FNLC vs MBWMBanner chart's image
First Ban
Price$25.41
Change-$0.32 (-1.24%)
Volume$168
Capitalization288.67M
Mercantile Bank
Price$45.55
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
Volume$63.53K
Capitalization740.19M
FNLC vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
FNLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLC vs. MBWM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLC is a StrongBuy and MBWM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLC: $25.73 vs. MBWM: $45.55)
Brand notoriety: FNLC and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLC: 67% vs. MBWM: 108%
Market capitalization -- FNLC: $288.67M vs. MBWM: $740.19M
FNLC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $288.67M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $740.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FNLC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNLC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNLC is a better buy in the short-term than MBWM.

Price Growth

FNLC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.84% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($740M) has a higher market cap than FNLC($289M). FNLC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: FNLC (9.16) vs MBWM (8.64). MBWM YTD gains are higher at: 5.192 vs. FNLC (-0.462). MBWM has more cash in the bank: 98.9M vs. FNLC (27.4M). FNLC has less debt than MBWM: FNLC (196M) vs MBWM (496M). MBWM has higher revenues than FNLC: MBWM (235M) vs FNLC (86.8M).
FNLCMBWMFNLC / MBWM
Capitalization289M740M39%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.4625.192-9%
P/E Ratio9.168.64106%
Revenue86.8M235M37%
Total Cash27.4M98.9M28%
Total Debt196M496M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLC vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
FNLC
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4619
SMR RATING
1..100
4626
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7462
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLC's Valuation (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (29). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (46). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (46). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

FNLC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (57). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (74). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLCMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GABSX44.290.13
+0.29%
Gabelli Small Cap Growth AAA
VADDX80.040.19
+0.24%
Invesco Equally-Wtd S&P 500 Y
FDKFX16.70N/A
N/A
Fidelity International Discovery K6
VSPRX14.45-0.01
-0.07%
Voya Small Company Port R6
RYIIX175.73-0.75
-0.42%
Rydex Internet Inv

FNLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLC has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNLC jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLC
1D Price
Change %
FNLC100%
+0.67%
FCBC - FNLC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
KRNY - FNLC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
BSRR - FNLC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
MBWM - FNLC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
UVSP - FNLC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
More

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
+0.07%
PEBO - MBWM
90%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
CTBI - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
HOPE - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
STBA - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
CCNE - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More