Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNKIX vs JVMCX
FNKIX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FNKIX vs JVMCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.06
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
FNKIX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNKIX vs. JVMCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNKIX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. FNKIX (30.8M). FNKIX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FNKIX (1.14) vs JVMCX (0.00). FNKIX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FNKIX (15 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FNKIX (1.14). FNKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.08 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNKIX: JVMCX (1000) vs FNKIX (1000000). FNKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.39 vs. JVMCX (-2.54). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.71 vs. FNKIX (49.52).
| FNKIX | JVMCX | FNKIX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.85 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.86 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.131 | 10.909 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.8M | 24.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.39 | -2.54 | -725% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.33 | 30.96 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.52 | 54.71 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.56 | 50.96 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement