Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNKCX vs MVCAX
FNKCX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FNKCX vs MVCAX
FNKCX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNKCX vs. MVCAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNKCX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. FNKCX (30.8M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FNKCX: MVCAX (0.84) vs FNKCX (0.29). FNKCX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FNKCX (15 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FNKCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). FNKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.26 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNKCX: MVCAX (1000) vs FNKCX (1500). FNKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.26 vs. MVCAX (-9.14). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.40 vs. FNKCX (37.14).
| FNKCX | MVCAX | FNKCX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.99 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.00 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.513 | 3.585 | 405% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.8M | 16.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.84 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.26 | -9.14 | -156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.40 | 20.07 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.14 | 44.40 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.90 | 70.98 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement