FNICF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
15.05M
TCVNF
Price
$0.42
Change
+$0.02 (+5.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
14.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNICF vs TCVNF

Header iconFNICF vs TCVNF Comparison
Open Charts FNICF vs TCVNFBanner chart's image
Fathom Nickel
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$37.5K
Capitalization15.05M
Tocvan Ventures
Price$0.42
Change+$0.02 (+5.00%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization14.48M
FNICF vs TCVNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCVNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNICF vs. TCVNF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNICF is a Hold and TCVNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FNICF: $0.03 vs. TCVNF: $0.42)
Brand notoriety: FNICF and TCVNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNICF: 49% vs. TCVNF: 102%
Market capitalization -- FNICF: $15.05M vs. TCVNF: $14.48M
FNICF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.05M. TCVNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $14.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNICF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTCVNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TCVNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNICF is a better buy in the long-term than TCVNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNICF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCVNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNICF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCVNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FNICF and TCVNF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FNICF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -18.15% price change this week, while TCVNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.42% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNICF($15M) and TCVNF($14.5M) have the same market capitalization . FNICF YTD gains are higher at: 40.306 vs. TCVNF (17.500). FNICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.76M vs. TCVNF (-2.26M). TCVNF has more cash in the bank: 2.24M vs. FNICF (524K). FNICF has less debt than TCVNF: FNICF (258K) vs TCVNF (1.95M). FNICF (0) and TCVNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FNICFTCVNFFNICF / TCVNF
Capitalization15M14.5M103%
EBITDA-1.76M-2.26M78%
Gain YTD40.30617.500230%
P/E Ratio2.37N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash524K2.24M23%
Total Debt258K1.95M13%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNICFTCVNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCVNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BACRP248.0029.00
+13.24%
Bank of America Corp.
JWSMF9.75N/A
N/A
Jaws Mustang Acquisition Corp.
PTAUY13.90N/A
N/A
Port of Tauranga Ltd.
TEKCF0.11N/A
N/A
Tekcapital plc
ANGPY7.90-0.25
-3.07%
Valterra Platinum Ltd

FNICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNICF and NRVTF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNICF and NRVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNICF
1D Price
Change %
FNICF100%
N/A
NRVTF - FNICF
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.69%
ELMTF - FNICF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEMIF - FNICF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
SRKZF - FNICF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNUF - FNICF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TCVNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCVNF and DLPRF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCVNF and DLPRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCVNF
1D Price
Change %
TCVNF100%
N/A
DLPRF - TCVNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGNMF - TCVNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - TCVNF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNICF - TCVNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLRSF - TCVNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More