Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGZX vs REEBX
FNGZX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNGZX vs REEBX
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$18.84
Change+$0.10 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets889.15M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$60.20
Change-$0.32 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
FNGZX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGZX vs. REEBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGZX is a StrongBuy and REEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FNGZX (889M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than REEBX: FNGZX (1.80) vs REEBX (0.42). FNGZX was incepted earlier than REEBX: FNGZX (17 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FNGZX (0.95). REEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: REEBX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). FNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. REEBX (9.20). REEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.58 vs. FNGZX (5.47).
| FNGZX | REEBX | FNGZX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.27 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.27 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.370 | 14.123 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 889M | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.42 | 426% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.40 | 9.20 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.08 | 28.54 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.47 | 12.58 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.19 | 25.16 | 295% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement